Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-5
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Portability
90 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
90 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2017
- Replaced the Olympus TG-4
- New Model is Olympus TG-6
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus TG-5, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and TG-5 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR800 was announced 4 years earlier than the TG-5 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the TG-5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Olympus Tough TG-5. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus TG-5
| EX-ZR800 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| TG-5 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | August 2013 | More recent by 45 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-5
| EX-ZR800 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus TG-5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the TG-5.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and TG-5 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and TG-5.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to produce greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-ZR800 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-5
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
offers face detect focus
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
has manual focus
includes face detect focus
supports RAW formats
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography details
Olympus TG-5 Street photography details
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (222 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than others (250 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography details
Olympus TG-5 Sports photography details
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
offers tracking focus
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
high fps (20.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
weather proofing
good battery pack (340 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-5 Travel photography advice
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
lighter than average (222 grams)
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
good battery pack (340 shots)
weather proofing
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than others (250g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-5 Landscape photography info
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
better than average battery pack (470 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
has manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
good battery pack (340 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-5 Vlogging highlights
quite wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (222 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic port
rather wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone port
more heavy than others (250g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2017-05-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | 340 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $429 | $449 |