Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VG-160
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus VG-160, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR800 was released 20 months after the VG-160 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR800 scores versus the VG-160 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus VG-160
| EX-ZR800 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 20 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| VG-160 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus VG-160
| EX-ZR800 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus VG-160 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the VG-160.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and VG-160 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and VG-160.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR800 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VG-160 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
comes with face detect focusing
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
manual focus not available
no manual mode
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography features
Olympus VG-160 Street photography features
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (222 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lighter than competition in class (125g)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography info
Olympus VG-160 Sports photography info
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
great battery (470 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery life (165 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography information
Olympus VG-160 Travel photography information
great battery (470 shots)
lighter than others in class (222g)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
no Timelapse mode
bad battery life (165 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography features
Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography features
has manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
great battery (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
really wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3")
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery life (165 CIPA)
no Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging features
Olympus VG-160 Vlogging features
decently wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (222g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
missing mic jack
really wide (26mm)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (125g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone jack
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 165 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $429 | $90 |