Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released August 2013
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Successor is Olympus VR-330
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

In this write-up, we are evaluating the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly similar and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-ZR800 was revealed 2 years after the VR-320 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 

				

					

						
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus VR-320

					

					

						
 EX-ZR800 VR-320 
LaunchedAugust 2013July 2011More modern by 25 months
Manually focus  Very exact focus
Display resolution922k230kClearer display (+692k dot)
					

				


				

					

						
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-ZR800

					

					

						
 VR-320 EX-ZR800 
					

				


				

					

						
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus VR-320

					

					

						
 EX-ZR800 VR-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen  Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display  Neither contains Touch display
					

				

				

	
	
	
	

				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

					

					

						
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the VR-320.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

					

					

						
Sometimes, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The picture here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and VR-320.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer you extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

						Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison
					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

					

					

											

					Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison				


								Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms				

	
	
	
	

				

					
Photography Type Scores

					

				

				
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography factors
44
 manual focus
 decent sensor resolution (16MP)
 includes face detect focus
 can't use external flash
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
33
 good  resolution (14MP)
 provides face detect focusing
 lack of manual focus
 lack of manual mode
 can't use external flash
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Street Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Street photography camera
 Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
61
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average in class (222 grams)
 no moving screen
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
62
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (158 grams)
 screen is fixed
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
51
 great zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16MP)
 includes tracking focus
 great battery pack (470 CIPA)
 max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect auto focus
47
 long zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 provides tracking focus
 no shutter priority mode
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Travel Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Travel photography camera
 Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
74
 great battery pack (470 shots)
 lighter than average in class (222g)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 pretty wide (25mm)
 great reach (450mm)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
70
 lighter than competition (158g)
 good  resolution (14MP)
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (24mm)
 long zoom (300mm)
 does not have Time Lapse recording
 does not posses selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography highlights
55
 manual focus
 pretty wide (25mm)
 decent sized screen (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 great battery pack (470 per charge)
 can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
42
 fairly wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 lack of manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 lack of manual mode
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
 does not have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR800
Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
34
 pretty wide (25mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 includes face detect focus
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than average in class (222g)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 does not have mic support
32
 fairly wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detect focusing
 lighter than competition (158g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 does not posses selfie friendly display
 low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
 does not have mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
				
								
				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

					

					

											


					

						Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus VR-320
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Name Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Olympus VR-320
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2013-08-07 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXILIM Engine HS 3 TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Touch focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Single autofocus    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 4cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 922k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash range 4.70 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 222 grams (0.49 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-130 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $429 $179