Casio EX-ZR800 vs Panasonic FX75
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Panasonic FX75, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is fairly close and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR800 was announced 3 years after the FX75 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the FX75 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Panasonic FX75
EX-ZR800 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 39 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Casio EX-ZR800
FX75 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Panasonic FX75
EX-ZR800 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Panasonic FX75 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the FX75.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and FX75 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The image underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and FX75.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to render more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Panasonic |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 165 grams (0.36 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $429 | $139 |