Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax E85
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


95 Imaging
35 Features
10 Overall
25
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax E85 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 145g - 93 x 58 x 24mm
- Launched September 2009

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax E85 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax E85, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and E85 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR800 was introduced 3 years later than the E85 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-ZR800 scores against the E85 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax E85 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Pentax Optio E85. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Pentax E85 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Pentax E85
EX-ZR800 | E85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | ![]() | September 2009 | Fresher by 48 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax E85 over the Casio EX-ZR800
E85 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Pentax E85
EX-ZR800 | E85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax E85 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 features physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Pentax E85 has measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax E85 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the E85.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and E85 is 91 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax E85 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through specs. The graphic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and E85.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to provide you with extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax E85 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax E85 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Pentax Optio E85 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Pentax |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Pentax Optio E85 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2009-09-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 32-96mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.9-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 145 gr (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 58 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | D-LI95 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $429 | $0 |