Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2011
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Pentax. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WG-1 GPS (14MP) is fairly close and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR800 was launched 2 years after the WG-1 GPS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR800 scores versus the WG-1 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
EX-ZR800 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | August 2011 | Newer by 25 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Casio EX-ZR800
WG-1 GPS | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
EX-ZR800 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 features outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Pentax WG-1 GPS has specifications of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the WG-1 GPS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and WG-1 GPS is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and WG-1 GPS.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR800 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Pentax |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 260 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $429 | $350 |