Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX2
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR800 was revealed 4 years after the CX2 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the CX2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh CX2
| EX-ZR800 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2013 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 49 months |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| CX2 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh CX2
| EX-ZR800 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh CX2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the CX2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and CX2 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specs. The picture underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and CX2.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to deliver extra detail because of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 185g (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $429 | $341 |