Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX5
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX5, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and CX5 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR800 was manufactured 2 years later than the CX5 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the CX5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Ricoh CX5. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh CX5
| EX-ZR800 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2013 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Clearer screen (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| CX5 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh CX5
| EX-ZR800 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX5 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the CX5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and CX5 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The photograph below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and CX5.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer you more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-08-07 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $429 | $399 |