Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800/Casio-EX-ZR800-front.jpg)
![Ricoh CX6 front Ricoh CX6 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-CX6/Ricoh-CX6-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Released November 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh CX6, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and CX6 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR800 was unveiled 22 months after the CX6 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the CX6 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Ricoh CX6. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Ricoh CX6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh CX6
EX-ZR800 | CX6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | ![]() | November 2011 | Newer by 22 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Casio EX-ZR800
CX6 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 922k | Sharper screen (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh CX6
EX-ZR800 | CX6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX6 has sizing of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh CX6 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the CX6.
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-Ricoh-CX6-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and CX6 is 91 and 92 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-Ricoh-CX6-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The picture here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and CX6.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-Ricoh-CX6-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-Ricoh-CX6-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh CX6 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh CX6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh CX6 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2011-11-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 922k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $429 | $595 |