Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa88/daa88bfe6d889d427e008123c5647754bbcdb923" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74efc/74efc246825aff5ab2faab7c06cfeb0ab333069a" alt="Ricoh G900 front Ricoh G900 front"
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh G900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-ZR800 was announced 5 years earlier than the G900 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR800 grades against the G900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh G900
EX-ZR800 | G900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-ZR800
G900 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2013 | Newer by 55 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 922k | Crisper screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh G900
EX-ZR800 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 comes with exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh G900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the G900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a51b6/a51b61057fe6b32e8aa27a4667e02ea4a98bdc3b" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and G900 is 91 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6109d/6109d84056efdb534c9049fbbcc240cdc9a4f9a5" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and G900.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh G900 to resolve more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR800 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a95f0/a95f025e7d3d8ba0ed2c0d7b10ee3346d5c7f68f" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cbc4/5cbc4591a6d3c614f7b6409e89e1f9731240b4d1" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh G900 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2018-02-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 922k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840x2160 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 340 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $429 | $752 |