Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR800 was launched 3 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-ZR800 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | November 2009 | Newer by 46 months | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Crisper screen (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-ZR800
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-ZR800 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 91 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The image underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR800 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Casio EX-ZR800 will provide more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 453 gr (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 320 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $429 | $566 |