Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
55
Overall
46
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced August 2013
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Revealed November 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-ZR800 was launched 3 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 EX-ZR800 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
RevealedAugust 2013November 2009Newer by 46 months
Screen resolution922k920kCrisper screen (+2k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-ZR800

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro EX-ZR800 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 EX-ZR800 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 91 and 77 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The image underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

To sum up, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR800 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Casio EX-ZR800 will provide more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography details
44
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
55
has manual focus
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography factors
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography factors
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
62
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography information
51
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
good battery life (470 per charge)
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
32
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
no liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
bad battery (320 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography details
74
good battery life (470 shots)
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
49
has built in flash
bad battery (320 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography information
55
focusing manually
quite wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good battery life (470 per charge)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
46
has manual focus
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
bad battery (320 shots)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging info
34
quite wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (222g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
20
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Company Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2013-08-07 2009-11-10
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 50mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/2.5
Macro focus distance 4cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 922k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 180s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/3200s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 222 gr (0.49 lbs) 453 gr (1.00 lbs)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photos 320 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $429 $566