Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-4

The following is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Ricoh WG-4, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-ZR800 was introduced 6 months before the WG-4 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the WG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.

If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the WG-4.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and WG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.

Generally, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The pic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and WG-4.

As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you should always consider the age of the cameras into account.