Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR800 was announced 6 months earlier than the WG-4 GPS which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-ZR800 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WG-4 GPS | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-ZR800 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 |  | February 2014 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the WG-4 GPS.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and WG-4 GPS is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The graphic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and WG-4 GPS.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you should really consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
features face detection focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (222 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (235g)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography details
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography details
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
good battery (470 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
environment proof
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (240 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography factors
good battery (470 shots)
lighter than competitors (222g)
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
environment proof
good MP (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery pack (240 shots)
heavier than competitors in class (235 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography advice
you can focus manually
quite wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good battery (470 per charge)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
has manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
environment proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
terrible battery pack (240 CIPA)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Vlogging camera
quite wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (222 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic support
decently wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not offer selfie friendly display
does not have external mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (235g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | 240 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $429 | $210 |