Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-6
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Ricoh WG-6, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WG-6 (20MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR800 was revealed 5 years before the WG-6 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the WG-6 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-6. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh WG-6
| EX-ZR800 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WG-6 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 | August 2013 | More modern by 55 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 922k | Crisper screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-6
| EX-ZR800 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-6 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Ricoh WG-6 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the WG-6.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and WG-6 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The pic here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and WG-6.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-6 to provide more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR800 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 246 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 340 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $429 | $271 |