Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800/Casio-EX-ZR800-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-70/Ricoh-WG-70-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Successor is Ricoh WG-80
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR800 was brought out 7 years earlier than the WG-70 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the WG-70 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh WG-70
EX-ZR800 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-ZR800
WG-70 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | August 2013 | Newer by 79 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-70
EX-ZR800 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the WG-70.
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and WG-70 is 91 and 91 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and WG-70.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact MP so you can expect comparable quality of photos however you will want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR800 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR800-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh WG-70 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2020-02-04 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $429 | $280 |