Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung EX2F
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Introduced December 2012
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Lets look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung EX2F, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR800 was introduced 8 months after the EX2F which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung EX2F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung EX2F
EX-ZR800 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2013 | December 2012 | Newer by 8 months | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 0k | Crisper screen (+922k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-ZR800
EX2F | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung EX2F
EX-ZR800 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung EX2F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the EX2F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and EX2F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and EX2F.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR800 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Casio EX-ZR800 will deliver more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-08-07 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 4cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 294 gr (0.65 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $429 | $478 |