Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera 2 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR800 was revealed 4 months before the Galaxy Camera 2 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 scores versus the Galaxy Camera 2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
| EX-ZR800 | Galaxy Camera 2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| Galaxy Camera 2 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 4.8" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 922k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
| EX-ZR800 | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2013 |  | January 2014 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 has proportions of 133mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") along with a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the Galaxy Camera 2.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and Galaxy Camera 2 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The image underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and Galaxy Camera 2.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures although you should always factor the release date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Portrait photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
has face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
supports face detection focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Street photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
image stabilization (Optical)
has focus via touch
lighter than competitors in class (283g)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography features
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Sports photography features
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
good battery power (470 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
great battery power (400 CIPA)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography factors
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Travel photography factors
good battery power (470 shots)
lighter than competition (222g)
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
long zoom (450mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
great battery power (400 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (283g)
connects via bluetooth
has focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography factors
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Landscape photography factors
focusing manually
quite wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good battery power (470 shots)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
manual focus
rather wide (23mm)
big screen (4.8 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
great battery power (400 shots)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR800
Vlogging with Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
quite wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (222g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic jack
rather wide (23mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has external mic jack
lighter than competitors in class (283 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2014-01-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 283g (0.62 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 400 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | Built-in |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $429 | $400 |