Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Released August 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR800 was introduced 12 months after the Galaxy Camera 4G so they are of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the Galaxy Camera 4G in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| EX-ZR800 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 |  | August 2012 | More modern by 12 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+922k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Casio EX-ZR800
| Galaxy Camera 4G | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 4.8" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| EX-ZR800 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has specifications of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the Galaxy Camera 4G.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and Galaxy Camera 4G is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The image below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and Galaxy Camera 4G.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP so you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you might want to take the age of the cameras into account. The newer EX-ZR800 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
supports face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
resolution is good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography features
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Street photography features
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (222g)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (305 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography info
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sports photography info
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery power (470 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (23-481mm 20.9 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Travel photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
lighter than average (222 grams)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
long zoom (450mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competitors in class (305 grams)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
relatively wide (23mm)
great reach (481mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Landscape photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
focusing manually
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
relatively wide (23mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
lovely big screen (4.8 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR800
Vlogging with Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
fairly wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (222 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic jack
relatively wide (23mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (305g)
display is not selfie friendly
no external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-08-07 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | - |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 305 grams (0.67 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $429 | $550 |