Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ35W
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR800 was manufactured 3 years after the HZ35W which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the HZ35W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung HZ35W
| EX-ZR800 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2013 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 39 months |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 614k | Clearer screen (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-ZR800
| HZ35W | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung HZ35W
| EX-ZR800 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 has external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung HZ35W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the HZ35W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and HZ35W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The image below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and HZ35W.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $429 | $300 |