Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa88/daa88bfe6d889d427e008123c5647754bbcdb923" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30878/3087870e2a184bb7b129e14c5c1172ecd9956fa4" alt="Samsung NX1000 front Samsung NX1000 front"
90 Imaging
61 Features
60 Overall
60
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Launched April 2012
- Successor is Samsung NX1100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung NX1000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the NX1000 (20MP) is very well matched but the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and NX1000 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-ZR800 was manufactured 16 months after the NX1000 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR800 grades against the NX1000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung NX1000. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung NX1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung NX1000
EX-ZR800 | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | ![]() | April 2012 | More modern by 16 months |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1000 over the Casio EX-ZR800
NX1000 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung NX1000
EX-ZR800 | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 has external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX1000 has specifications of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung NX1000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the NX1000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5370a/5370a46829b2609b9aef83048c34d792563869f3" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and NX1000 is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c79a/5c79a64fa582c93e92ba1db5a0895b4d54dbdd48" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and NX1000.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR800 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Samsung NX1000 will give greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b312b/b312be37faed43229597579784f3d0289a2957da" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9a46/f9a46ff082e426ed1059dc7b3932e0e1a7465628" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung NX1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung NX1000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2012-04-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 222g (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 840 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | 320 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $429 | $388 |