Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa88/daa88bfe6d889d427e008123c5647754bbcdb923" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88a11/88a11bb02e0ad8b3bdbbf0916f24e031f73d8b87" alt="Samsung NX210 front Samsung NX210 front"
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Announced August 2012
- Older Model is Samsung NX200
- Successor is Samsung NX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung NX210, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the NX210 (20MP) is very comparable but the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and NX210 (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-ZR800 was released 12 months later than the NX210 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX210 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the NX210 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung NX210. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung NX210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung NX210
EX-ZR800 | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | ![]() | August 2012 | Fresher by 12 months |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Casio EX-ZR800
NX210 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung NX210
EX-ZR800 | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung NX210 has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung NX210 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the NX210.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9681/a96812b7f82a2849bf58dfc54ebde6545f8a5558" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and NX210 is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34884/34884443308ce44b4dea10ea3d67586f92fb6b6f" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and NX210.
To sum up, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR800 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF harder and the Samsung NX210 will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48a8f/48a8f4bd3c1d0ef06c796f554932e570ec66f993" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34499/34499a31c6950213a11da317ec83f2b76090fc56" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung NX210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung NX210 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2012-08-14 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 719 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | 330 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $429 | $625 |