Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL120
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
99 Imaging
37 Features
20 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL120 Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung PL120, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the PL120 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR800 was launched 2 years later than the PL120 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung PL120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the PL120 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL120 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung PL120. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung PL120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung PL120
EX-ZR800 | PL120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 32 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL120 over the Casio EX-ZR800
PL120 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung PL120
EX-ZR800 | PL120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL120 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL120 has specifications of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung PL120 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the PL120.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and PL120 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL120 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The visual here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and PL120.
Plainly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL120 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL120 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung PL120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung PL120 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | - |
Cost at release | $429 | $150 |