Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL200
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed July 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung PL200, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly similar and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR800 was launched 3 years later than the PL200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 grades against the PL200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung PL200. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung PL200
| EX-ZR800 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 38 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| PL200 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung PL200
| EX-ZR800 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 has outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung PL200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the PL200.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and PL200 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The photograph below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and PL200.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung PL200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 170g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $429 | $0 |