Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL210
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL210 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL210, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the PL210 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR800 was brought out 2 years later than the PL210 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung PL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the PL210 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL210 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung PL210. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung PL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung PL210
EX-ZR800 | PL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 32 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL210 over the Casio EX-ZR800
PL210 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung PL210
EX-ZR800 | PL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung PL210 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL210 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the PL210.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and PL210 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL210 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and PL210.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to show greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung PL210 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung PL210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung PL210 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $429 | $200 |