Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL102
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung SL102, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR800 was manufactured 4 years after the SL102 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR800 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 56 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| SL102 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR800 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the SL102.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specifications. The pic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and SL102.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to show more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $429 | $130 |