Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL202
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL202, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observationsThe EX-ZR800 was introduced 4 years after the SL202 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-ZR800 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 55 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| SL202 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung SL202
| EX-ZR800 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the SL202.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and SL202 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The image here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and SL202.
Clearly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to resolve extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography advice
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography advice
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has face detection focus
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
features face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (222g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography factors
Samsung SL202 Sports photography factors
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
good battery (470 shots)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Travel photography camera
good battery (470 per charge)
lighter than others in class (222g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography details
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography details
manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
good battery (470 per charge)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
fairly wide (28mm)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging information
Samsung SL202 Vlogging information
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (222g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic port
fairly wide (28mm)
features face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $429 | $140 |
