Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST150F
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
Samsung ST150F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Released January 2013
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST150F, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR800 was introduced 8 months after the ST150F which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the ST150F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung ST150F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung ST150F
| EX-ZR800 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 8 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Casio EX-ZR800
| ST150F | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST150F
| EX-ZR800 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 features physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung ST150F has specifications of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST150F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the ST150F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and ST150F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading a spec sheet. The image below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and ST150F.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photos but you have to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer EX-ZR800 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography factors
Samsung ST150F Portrait photography factors
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
features face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Street photography with Samsung ST150F
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (222 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lighter than competitors in class (114 grams)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Sports photography with Samsung ST150F
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
great battery power (470 per charge)
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
decent megapixels (16MP)
offers tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Travel photography with Samsung ST150F
great battery power (470 per charge)
lighter than competitors (222 grams)
megapixel count good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
very long zoom (450mm)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competitors in class (114 grams)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
no Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography information
Samsung ST150F Landscape photography information
has manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
great battery power (470 shots)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
decent megapixels (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging advice
Samsung ST150F Vlogging advice
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (222g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
no mic support
rather wide (25mm)
offers face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (114g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 114g (0.25 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $429 | $300 |