Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
95 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung ST600, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the ST600 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR800 was announced 3 years after the ST600 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the ST600 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung ST600. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung ST600
EX-ZR800 | ST600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | January 2010 | More modern by 44 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Casio EX-ZR800
ST600 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1152k | 922k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST600
EX-ZR800 | ST600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung ST600 has measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung ST600 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the ST600.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and ST600 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by researching specifications. The image here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and ST600.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to result in extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST600 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST600 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 150 gr (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | SLB07 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $429 | $330 |