Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa88/daa88bfe6d889d427e008123c5647754bbcdb923" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7bfa/c7bfa68a24b5953a06e6c1f6318febf8f9fa1e24" alt="Samsung ST600 front Samsung ST600 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung ST600, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the ST600 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-ZR800 was announced 3 years after the ST600 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the ST600 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung ST600. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung ST600
EX-ZR800 | ST600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 44 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Casio EX-ZR800
ST600 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 922k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST600
EX-ZR800 | ST600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung ST600 has measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung ST600 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the ST600.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4e7b/e4e7b20e2c2a1957c5cc7fbc232eb0c10a9ae138" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and ST600 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ae0e/0ae0ee0584e7e92789f6b70fa09ff01ced082a5a" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by researching specifications. The image here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and ST600.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to result in extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc126/bc1267339e2c3406c36e136b57c4e4aca9b77a74" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d57f9/d57f972cf75a8f560ec4887511532b81b59e1ba8" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST600 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST600 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 150 gr (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | SLB07 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $429 | $330 |