Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST6500
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
99 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST6500 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST6500, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the ST6500 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR800 was released 2 years later than the ST6500 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the ST6500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST6500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung ST6500. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung ST6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung ST6500
EX-ZR800 | ST6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 32 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Casio EX-ZR800
ST6500 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST6500
EX-ZR800 | ST6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST6500 has specifications of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST6500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the ST6500.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and ST6500 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The graphic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and ST6500.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures though you should really factor the age of the products into consideration. The more recent EX-ZR800 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST6500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST6500 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-08-07 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $429 | - |