Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST700
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
99 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST700, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR800 was released 2 years after the ST700 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST700 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the ST700 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST700. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung ST700
| EX-ZR800 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2013 | January 2011 | More modern by 32 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| ST700 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST700
| EX-ZR800 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung ST700 has sizing of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST700 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the ST700.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and ST700 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The picture here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and ST700.
All in all, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of files though you should take the production date of the cameras into account. The more modern EX-ZR800 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-08-07 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $429 | $280 |