Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST90
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST90 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST90, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the ST90 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR800 was announced 2 years later than the ST90 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the ST90 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST90 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST90. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung ST90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung ST90
EX-ZR800 | ST90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 32 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST90 over the Casio EX-ZR800
ST90 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST90
EX-ZR800 | ST90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST90 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST90 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST90 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the ST90.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and ST90 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST90 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at technical specs. The visual here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and ST90.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to give you greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR800 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST90 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST90 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 4cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $429 | $150 |