Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST95
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST95, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR800 was brought out 2 years after the ST95 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the ST95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung ST95. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung ST95
| EX-ZR800 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 32 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| ST95 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST95
| EX-ZR800 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 has outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the ST95.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and ST95 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The picture here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and ST95.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP and you can expect similar quality of files however you should really factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The fresher EX-ZR800 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST95 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $429 | $145 |