Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225

Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced August 2013
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Launched August 2009
  • Alternate Name is ST550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225 Overview

Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-ZR800 was brought out 4 years after the TL225 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR800 scores versus the TL225 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung TL225

		

		

			
 EX-ZR800 TL225 
LaunchedAugust 2013August 2009More modern by 49 months
Focus manually  Very accurate focusing
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-ZR800

		

		

			
 TL225 EX-ZR800 
Screen sizing3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1152k922kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen  Quickly navigate
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL225

		

		

			
 EX-ZR800 TL225 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 comes with external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL225 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the TL225.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225 size comparison
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and TL225 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Often, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The picture here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and TL225.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to give greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
	
			Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Portrait photography camera
 Samsung TL225 as a Portrait photography camera
44
 manual focus
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 includes face detection focusing
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
21
 no manual focus
 no manual control
 external flash not possible
 low MP (12 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography highlights
Samsung TL225 Street photography highlights
61
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (222 grams)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
59
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 provides touch to focus
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 more heavy than competition in class (187g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography info
Samsung TL225 Sports photography info
51
 amazing zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 includes tracking autofocus
 better than average battery (470 shots)
 max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect AF
27
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 no shutter priority
 low MP (12 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography factors
Samsung TL225 Travel photography factors
74
 better than average battery (470 shots)
 lighter than competition (222 grams)
 decent sensor resolution (16MP)
 built-in flash
 rather wide (25mm)
 very long zoom (450mm)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
59
 provides touch to focus
 has built in flash
 rather wide (27mm)
 no Timelapse mode
 more heavy than competition in class (187 grams)
 low MP (12MP)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Landscape photography camera
 Samsung TL225 as a Landscape photography camera
55
 manual focus
 rather wide (25mm)
 pretty good screen size (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 better than average battery (470 CIPA)
 cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
37
 rather wide (27mm)
 screen larger than average (3.5")
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 no manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 no manual control
 low MP (12 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 no Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR800
Vlogging with Samsung TL225
34
 rather wide (25mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 includes face detection focusing
 great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than competition (222g)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 lack of external mic jack
29
 rather wide (27mm)
 touch screen
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
 no microphone jack
 more heavy than competition in class (187g)
Photography Glossary
	

		

			
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL225
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Samsung TL225
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Samsung TL225
Also Known as - ST550
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2013-08-07 2009-08-13
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch to focus    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-450mm (18.0x) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range 4cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3.5 inches
Screen resolution 922 thousand dot 1,152 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch display    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.40 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
External flash    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 222 grams (0.49 lbs) 187 grams (0.41 lbs)
Dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-130 SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $429 $488