Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa88/daa88bfe6d889d427e008123c5647754bbcdb923" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d6c3/8d6c3208a98a04c133c77814dcb12d444671965b" alt="Samsung TL240 front Samsung TL240 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung TL240, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly similar and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The EX-ZR800 was launched 3 years after the TL240 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the TL240 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung TL240
EX-ZR800 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 44 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Casio EX-ZR800
TL240 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL240
EX-ZR800 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the TL240.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fe62/1fe62e6d7e185dd10bd2d1a999bd4c33cb0b9326" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and TL240 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/009f4/009f41909268faa173d240ab7c7822d9637f2d6d" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and TL240.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30c2f/30c2fefa237083379f1004cb3836b47ddad2ca24" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6a3a/f6a3a66048e3a0d676fc941668050fdc80cfe8ac" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung TL240 |
Otherwise known as | - | ST5000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $429 | $171 |