Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL320
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL320, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-ZR800 was released 4 years later than the TL320 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the TL320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung TL320
| EX-ZR800 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 55 months |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| TL320 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL320
| EX-ZR800 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 comes with outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the TL320.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and TL320 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The photograph below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and TL320.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung TL320 |
| Alternate name | - | WB1000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $429 | $380 |
