Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa88/daa88bfe6d889d427e008123c5647754bbcdb923" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2103a/2103adbddc269259d95545a9af4d247992bac1f0" alt="Samsung TL350 front Samsung TL350 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternate Name is WB2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung TL350, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-ZR800 was revealed 3 years after the TL350 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the TL350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung TL350. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung TL350
EX-ZR800 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Casio EX-ZR800
TL350 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL350
EX-ZR800 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 features outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung TL350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the TL350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be6b9/be6b99ac345c0fa55cdf994110f3b2b85090d39c" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and TL350 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2364/f236405eaa825b58e9cb210fe8203eebee0f2cc4" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The pic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and TL350.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to provide you with extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0855/b0855bfe1fe93e45e86a9fd3203e536f1db2531f" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c7bc/5c7bce47b14501b3f8b519ce498dd16a13a06b5c" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung TL350 |
Also called | - | WB2000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $429 | $400 |