Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL500
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Also Known as EX1
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL500, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR800 was introduced 3 years later than the TL500 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-ZR800 scores versus the TL500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung TL500. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung TL500
| EX-ZR800 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 38 months |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 614k | Crisper screen (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| TL500 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL500
| EX-ZR800 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 features exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the TL500.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and TL500 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The photograph below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and TL500.
As you can tell, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR800 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Casio EX-ZR800 will provide more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung TL500 |
| Alternative name | - | EX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2010-07-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 386 grams (0.85 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $429 | $527 |
