Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB1100F
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
Samsung WB1100F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Revealed January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB1100F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB1100F (16MP) is pretty close and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR800 was unveiled 5 months earlier than the WB1100F so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the WB1100F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung WB1100F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB1100F
| EX-ZR800 | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WB1100F | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB1100F
| EX-ZR800 | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 |  | January 2014 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB1100F has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") along with a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB1100F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the WB1100F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and WB1100F is 91 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and WB1100F.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution so you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you will need to consider the age of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB1100F Portrait photography information
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography features
Samsung WB1100F Street photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (222 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition in class (512g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography information
Samsung WB1100F Sports photography information
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
great battery power (470 shots)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography details
Samsung WB1100F Travel photography details
great battery power (470 shots)
lighter than others in class (222 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great reach (875mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (512 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography features
Samsung WB1100F Landscape photography features
has manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
great battery power (470 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
manual focus
fairly wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging factors
Samsung WB1100F Vlogging factors
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (222 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone port
fairly wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic support
heavier than competition in class (512g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB1100F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB1100F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 512 grams (1.13 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $429 | $250 |