Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB150F
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR800 was released 20 months after the WB150F making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 scores against the WB150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung WB150F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-ZR800 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 20 months |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WB150F | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-ZR800 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB150F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the WB150F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and WB150F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and WB150F.
All in all, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR800 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB150F Portrait photography information
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
you can focus manually
MP count good (14MP)
features face detect focusing
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography advice
Samsung WB150F Street photography advice
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (222 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (188g)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography info
Samsung WB150F Sports photography info
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery (470 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14MP)
features tracking focus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB150F Travel photography highlights
better than average battery (470 per charge)
lighter than others (222 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than others in class (188 grams)
MP count good (14MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (432mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB150F Landscape photography details
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
better than average battery (470 per charge)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR800
Vlogging with Samsung WB150F
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (222g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic jack
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
lighter than others in class (188 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 188g (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $429 | $230 |