Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB210
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR800 was released 2 years after the WB210 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR800 grades against the WB210 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-ZR800 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2013 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 25 months |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+921k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WB210 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB210
| EX-ZR800 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 comes with external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB210 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the WB210.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and WB210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and WB210.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR800 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 174 gr (0.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $429 | $279 |