Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB30F
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Its time to look closer at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung WB30F, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR800 was launched 8 months after the WB30F so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 grades against the WB30F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZR800 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2013 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 8 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WB30F | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZR800 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung WB30F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the WB30F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and WB30F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and WB30F.
As you can tell, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact MP so you can expect similar quality of images though you should always factor the age of the products into consideration. The more recent EX-ZR800 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Portrait photography with Samsung WB30F
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has face detection focusing
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
features face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (222g)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (128g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography details
Samsung WB30F Sports photography details
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (470 CIPA)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
features tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Travel photography with Samsung WB30F
better than average battery pack (470 per charge)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition (128 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography information
Samsung WB30F Landscape photography information
manual focus
really wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
better than average battery pack (470 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging details
Samsung WB30F Vlogging details
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone socket
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
lighter than competition (128 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic port
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB30F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 128g (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $429 | $180 |
