Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
55
Overall
46
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced August 2013
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Launched January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-ZR800 was launched 5 months earlier than the WB350F so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the WB350F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB350F

 EX-ZR800 WB350F 
Screen resolution922k460kSharper screen (+462k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-ZR800

 WB350F EX-ZR800 
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB350F

 EX-ZR800 WB350F 
LaunchedAugust 2013January 2014Same age
Manual focus More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

See the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the WB350F.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and WB350F is 91 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and WB350F.

As you can tell, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos though you should really consider the age of the cameras into account.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography details
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography details
44
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
40
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography info
Samsung WB350F Street photography info
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (276g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography details
Samsung WB350F Sports photography details
51
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
great battery pack (470 CIPA)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
50
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
74
great battery pack (470 shots)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
resolution is good (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competition (276 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
no Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Landscape photography camera
55
manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
great battery pack (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
50
focusing manually
rather wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging features
Samsung WB350F Vlogging features
34
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no microphone support
34
rather wide (23mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (276g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB350F
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Samsung WB350F
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Samsung WB350F
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2013-08-07 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 4cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 922k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 222 grams (0.49 lb) 276 grams (0.61 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-130 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $429 $260