Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR800 was launched 5 months earlier than the WB350F so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the WB350F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB350F
| EX-ZR800 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WB350F | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB350F
| EX-ZR800 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2013 |  | January 2014 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the WB350F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and WB350F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and WB350F.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos though you should really consider the age of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography details
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography details
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography info
Samsung WB350F Street photography info
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (276g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography details
Samsung WB350F Sports photography details
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
great battery pack (470 CIPA)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
great battery pack (470 shots)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
resolution is good (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition (276 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
no Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
great battery pack (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
focusing manually
rather wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging features
Samsung WB350F Vlogging features
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no microphone support
rather wide (23mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (276g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no mic socket
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB350F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 276 grams (0.61 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $429 | $260 |