Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB35F
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR800 was launched 5 months before the WB35F so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the WB35F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB35F
| EX-ZR800 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WB35F | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB35F
| EX-ZR800 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 |  | January 2014 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 features outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the WB35F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and WB35F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by going through a spec sheet. The visual here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and WB35F.
As you can see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP so you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you should always factor the age of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Portrait photography with Samsung WB35F
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography information
Samsung WB35F Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (222g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB35F Sports photography factors
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (470 CIPA)
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography details
Samsung WB35F Travel photography details
better than average battery power (470 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (222g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than average in class (194 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
no Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
better than average battery power (470 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging factors
Samsung WB35F Vlogging factors
reasonably wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone jack
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $429 | $130 |