Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB50F
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2014
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is pretty close and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR800 was brought out 5 months earlier than the WB50F so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the WB50F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-ZR800 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WB50F | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-ZR800 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2013 |  | January 2014 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 comes with physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB50F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the WB50F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and WB50F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The pic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and WB50F.
All in all, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of pictures however you should really take the launch date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB50F Portrait photography info
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography info
Samsung WB50F Street photography info
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (222 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207g)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB50F Sports photography factors
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
good battery power (470 per charge)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB50F Travel photography highlights
good battery power (470 shots)
lighter than competitors (222g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (207g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good battery power (470 CIPA)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging information
Samsung WB50F Vlogging information
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (222 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 207g (0.46 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $429 | $180 |