Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB700
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed December 2010
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB700, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR800 was revealed 2 years after the WB700 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-ZR800 scores against the WB700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB700. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB700
EX-ZR800 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | December 2010 | More modern by 32 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 614k | Clearer screen (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-ZR800
WB700 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB700
EX-ZR800 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB700 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the WB700.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and WB700 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The image below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and WB700.
All in all, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to provide more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB700 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2010-12-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $429 | $300 |