Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR800 was released 8 months later than the WB800F so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB800F
EX-ZR800 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | January 2013 | More recent by 8 months | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-ZR800
WB800F | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB800F
EX-ZR800 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the WB800F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The graphic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP so you should expect comparable quality of files though you really should take the production date of the cameras into account. The younger EX-ZR800 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB800F |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-08-07 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $429 | $300 |