Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR800 was released 8 months later than the WB800F so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR800 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2013 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 8 months |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WB800F | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR800 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the WB800F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The graphic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP so you should expect comparable quality of files though you really should take the production date of the cameras into account. The younger EX-ZR800 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Portrait photography with Samsung WB800F
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes face detection focusing
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
features face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (222g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (218 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB800F Sports photography factors
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
lighter than average in class (222g)
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than average (218g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography highlights
has manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
focusing manually
pretty wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR800
Vlogging with Samsung WB800F
decently wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (222g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone jack
pretty wide (23mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (218g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-08-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $429 | $300 |