Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony H300
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony H300 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
Sony H300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Revealed February 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony H300 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony H300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the H300 (20MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR800 was unveiled 6 months earlier than the H300 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR800 scores against the H300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony H300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Sony H300
| EX-ZR800 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| H300 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony H300
| EX-ZR800 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 |  | February 2014 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 features physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony H300 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") along with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony H300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the H300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and H300 is 91 and 63 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and H300.
As you can see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony H300 to give greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony H300 as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
good MP (20 megapixels)
features face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography info
Sony H300 Street photography info
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (222g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competition (590g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Sports photography with Sony H300
great zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
great battery pack (470 per charge)
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20MP)
features tracking autofocus
great battery pack (350 shots)
max fps low (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography factors
Sony H300 Travel photography factors
great battery pack (470 per charge)
lighter than competitors (222g)
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
great battery pack (350 per charge)
good MP (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great zoom (875mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (590g)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony H300 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
great battery pack (470 shots)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20 megapixels)
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR800
Vlogging with Sony H300
relatively wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (222g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic jack
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
slow maximum aperture (f3)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic socket
heavier than competition (590g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony H300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 590 gr (1.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | 350 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $429 | $249 |
