Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX200V
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Announced May 2012
- Succeeded the Sony HX100V
- Successor is Sony HX300
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR800 was revealed 16 months later than the HX200V making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the HX200V with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Sony HX200V
| EX-ZR800 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2013 |  | May 2012 | More recent by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Casio EX-ZR800
| HX200V | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony HX200V
| EX-ZR800 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 922k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 features physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has sizing of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") along with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony HX200V in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the HX200V.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and HX200V is 91 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and HX200V.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Sony HX200V to result in extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Portrait photography with Sony HX200V
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
includes face detection autofocus
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
has manual focus
good MP (18MP)
includes face detection focus
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography information
Sony HX200V Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than others in class (583g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography information
Sony HX200V Sports photography information
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (470 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (18MP)
includes tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (450 shots)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long zoom (450mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery pack (450 shots)
good MP (18MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (27mm)
long zoom (810mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (583 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography information
Sony HX200V Landscape photography information
focusing manually
really wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
better than average battery power (470 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
has manual focus
relatively wide (27mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (18MP)
better than average battery pack (450 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging highlights
Sony HX200V Vlogging highlights
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone jack
relatively wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have external microphone support
more heavy than others in class (583 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2012-05-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 12.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 583g (1.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | 450 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $429 | $480 |
