Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony S950
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony S950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony S950 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony S950, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and S950 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR800 was brought out 4 years after the S950 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the S950 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony S950 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Sony S950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Sony S950
| EX-ZR800 | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| S950 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony S950
| EX-ZR800 | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony S950 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony S950 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the S950.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and S950 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading technical specs. The picture here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and S950.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer you greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony S950 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $429 | $130 |