Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony TX200V
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Sony TX200V, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR800 was released 19 months after the TX200V making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the TX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Sony TX200V
EX-ZR800 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | January 2012 | More modern by 19 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Casio EX-ZR800
TX200V | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 922k | Clearer display (+308k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony TX200V
EX-ZR800 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 comes with outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Sony TX200V in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the TX200V.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and TX200V is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The image underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and TX200V.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Sony TX200V to render more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 129g (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 220 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $429 | $500 |